November 21st, 2009 by dee

The truth is, laughter always sounds more perfect than weeping. Laughter flows in a violent riff and is effortlessly melodic. Weeping is often fought, choked, half strangled, or surrendered to with humiliation.
Forbes now releases 2009 high-performance-price actress list. Australian Actress Naomi Campbell who played in the Vajra, Eastern Promises and Mulholland Drive wins the top. However, George Wallace misses the top ten. To enable film companies to find the female stars who have most investment potential, Forbes elected 10 female stars. Through the comparison of the data analysis, it finally concluded the overall rankings.

41-year-old Naomi Watts was identified as that, in the three films she played in most recently, every one dollar invested on her could make as much as 44 dollars return. Jennifer Connelly who plays Blood Diamond and He’s Just Not That into You comes second. The rate of return to invest in her is 41:1, meaning that to invest one U.S. dollar in her can lead to 41 U.S. dollars in return.

She is followed by Rachel Mcadams for her splendid performance in the two films Notebook and The Time Traveler’s Wife. This parvenu female star’s return on investment reaches 30 to 1. The fourth name is Natalie Portman. Thanks to the latest “Star Wars” and “Another Bolin family’s girl”, her investment rate of return is 28:1.

Movie Queen Meryl Streep ranks fifth, the only senior. The success of Mamma Mia maintains her popular as investing 1 dollar returns 27 dollars. Among those who enters this year’s ranking list of the most cost-effective female stars of the year are also the popular female stars such as Jennifer Aniston, Halle Berry, Kate Blanchett, Anne Hathway, Hilary Swank.

However why Angelina Jolie, the popular star fails to enter the list? Because her high remuneration for a movie. Last year Julie gets 27,000,000 dollars and this year keeps rising. Since her remuneration is far above other actress who only acquires 5,000,000 dollars, so she fails in the cost performance. “Forbes,” says that this list comes out from the 100 Hollywood stars, and is based on the box office of the films where they have starred, their DVD calculation and the incomes of television pay-per-circulation.

Tags: Actress, Cost-Effective, Jolie